Part 2: The True State Of The Quran
- The Quran Was Revealed In Seven Forms (Ahruf)
- Does Islam Know Exactly What The 7 Forms Contained?
- Why Have The 7 Ahruf Become Unknown?
- Who Removed 6 Forms (Ahruf) From Use?
- a/ The Reason For Making One Text
- b/ What Happened to The Originals?
- c/ Discrepancies Between `Uthmans Manuscripts (Graphic Forms)
- a/ The Seven Readers
- b/ Several Of These Readings Are Still In Print Today
- c/ Expected Variations between the Hafs and Warsh Readings
- d/ Uthmans Corruptions Accepted As Divine Quran Till Today
- e/ "This Would Question The Perfection of God And The Validity of The Text"
- a/ The Final Outwitting a New Medinan Text or "Now You See Them, Now You Dont"
- b/ Kithman, Taqiyya, Tauriya
- c/ Originals In Tashkent And Istanbul? - Part of The Illusion.
- d/ The Samarqand Manuscript - Is It The Imam Manuscript?
- The Regional Manuscript Traditions In Print And In Use By Islam Today
- The 1924 Royal Cairo EDITION - The Oral Tradition vs Manuscripts
a/ Altering The Graphic Form
b/ Purifying The Reading
- Extensive Textual Comparison (Appendix A)
- "They Will Be found to Be Identical"?
- Why Are They Outwitting The Ummah?
- Evidence That the Samarqand Manuscript Is Not An Original
- ... Mix In One Small Portion of the Syrian Text..."
- Where Is The One Reading For The Last Form?
- The Quran Or Quran
- The Readings Today - Their Origins And Consequences
a/ The True Origins Of The Readings
b/ "The Seven [Readers] And Their Defects" - Disagreement Over The Readings
c/ Rationalising The Acceptance Of Differences In The Readings
(1) Different Transmitters Of The Same Reading Disagreed.
(2) The Need To Go Beyond Uthmans Graphic Forms.
(3) The Need To Believe There Is "More Than One Revelation".
d/ Readings Based On "A Consonantal Text That Differs"
- Why The Acceptance Of The 7, 10 And 14 Readings
- The New 7 Readings Conflict In Many Ways With The Manuscripts
a/ Deliberately Going Beyond Uthmans Graphic Forms
b/ Because "The Men Around Muhammad... Were Not Able To Write Well"
- Quranic Arabic - Correcting , Overriding, "Adding To" And Ignoring The Uthmanic Texts
- Did "Allah" Say No Or Yes? - Scholars Differ - So Do The Texts!!
- In Conclusion
- Mr. Deedat Trades Old Last Testament For New Last Testament & Some NOs for YESs
- a/ Should It Be Spelled With
(ta tawila) 
or (ta marbuta)? - b/ Dagger-Alifs
(1) Originals or non - Uthmanic Additions?
(2) For Replacing Thousands of Missing Alifs
(3) For Correcting THE Divine Name?
(4) Not Part of Quranic Script
(5) Numbers And Placement Differ in The Hafs And Warsh Texts
(6) A Dagger Alif Is Not A Ya-alif.
(7) For Replacing A Waw With An Alif
- c/ Playing With Uthmans Graphic Form - The Shaddah
(1) To Extend The Text
(2) To Alter The Meaning
(3) For Correcting THE Name Of God
- d/ Silencing The Surplus Waw - And More
- e/ More Silencing
- f/ More Symbols Ignored
- g/ A Strange Pronunciation?
- h/ Other Consonants Missing Or Added - Yas, Waws & Nuns
1/ Yas Omitted
2/ Waws Missing
3/ Nuns Missing
- i/ Sins Missing - "Allahs Wisdom"
- 50 000 Errors In The Quran?
- Heretical Steps?
- More Alterations To Uthmans Texts
- Uthmans Graphic Form Or "The Ottoman Script"?